Kronenberger Rosenfeld defends lawsuits under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), at California Penal Code Section 630, et seq. These cases involve alleged wiretapping, eavesdropping, and so-called "trap and trace" allegations, often based on a defendant's use of a third-party marketing pixels, cookies, or web beacons.
We have litigated or arbitrated a multitude of CIPA cases on behalf of defendants.
Kronenberger Rosenfeld is at the forefront of CIPA litigation defense, helping businesses around the country. If you have a CIPA lawsuit matter, contact our team today.
CIPA is a 50+ year-old law, passed in 1967, meant to criminalize eavesdropping on telephone calls. California has been active recently in passing the California Consumer Privacy Act ("CCPA") and California Privacy Rights Act ("CPRA"). However, individual consumers do not have a right to sue under the CCPA or CPRA. This has led plaintiff's attorneys to repurpose the decades old CIPA law to address privacy violations considering the rampant use of marketing pixels and cookies that pass private information of website users to companies such as Meta (i.e. Facebook).
CIPA is a powerful statute for plaintiffs because it provides for statutory damages of $5,000 per violation, which can create massive financial risks for defendants.
The lawsuits and arbitration complaints focus on a few main arguments. Specifically, plaintiffs argue that website tracking technologies are analogized to unlawful "pen registers" or "trap-and-trace" devices. Specifically, technologies used on websites, like cookies or tracking pixels, capture information, like IP addresses, when users visit the site. That information can be sent to third parties, like Facebook, TikTok, and Google. Plaintiffs argue that this collection and sending of information without consent to third parties is similar to the use of a pen register or trap-and-trace device, and which would be a violation of CIPA.
While some courts have been skeptical about the merits of these arguments by plaintiffs, other courts have refused to quickly dismiss cases. As these cases work their way through state and federal courts, there are strong arguments that defendants can assert at any stage.
Our firm vigorously defends CIPA claims on behalf of our defendant clients, in both courts and in arbitration. If you have been named in a lawsuit or arbitration alleging CIPA violations, or if you have received a demand letter alleging CIPA violations, we would be happy to discuss how we could help. Contact us today using our online submission form.
Get Legal Help Now
Have a matter concerning
CIPA Defense?
We welcome you to submit your details using our contact form
VOGUE v. DOGUE, Jack Daniels and the Newest Edition of Parody Trademark Litigation
April 15, 2026
When does a parody cross the line into trademark infringement? In Condé Nast’s Vogue v. Dogue lawsuit, the publisher of VOGUE claims a dog‑themed fashion magazine called DOGUE goes too...
Resources & Self-Education
IP Lessons from Twitter: Avoid Trademark Cancellation through Bona Fide Use
December 9, 2025
The value of a trademark may outlast the commercial phase it was born in – but if a company stops using its marks in genuine, ongoing commerce, its registrations can...
Resources & Self-Education
AI-Assisted Image Receives Copyright Protection for the First Time
June 10, 2025
For the first time, the U.S. Copyright Office has granted copyright protection to an AI-generated image. The groundbreaking decision is the result of a challenge made by Invoke, a generative...
General News & Firm Announcements
What is a Trademark Knockout Search?
February 1, 2022
You may think that you have found the perfect new trademark to begin building your brand. But before you invest the time and expense of building your brand, an essential...
Resources & Self-Education
Failed drug test, No drug use. What next?
November 12, 2021
I just failed a drug test for the presence of marijuana metabolites, but I don’t use marijuana. What happens now? First, you should know that you are not alone. Failing...
Resources & Self-Education
Firm Files Lawsuit on Behalf of Aydin Aghdashloo against Afshin Parvaresh
June 29, 2021
On June 15, 2021, the firm, representing Aydin Aghdashloo, filed a federal complaint against Afshin Parvaresh, which is available here. The case is captioned Aydin Aghdashloo v. Mohsen Parvaresh Mohseni...
General News & Firm Announcements
Categories
Try typing keywords like FTC, Advertising, Trademark, etc...