April 19, 2013

Consent Requirements for Federal Text (SMS) Message Spam Laws to Change in October of 2013

By

The federal government is poised to implement new, stricter consumer consent rules designed to “further reduce the opportunities for telemarketers to place unwanted or unexpected calls to consumers.” The rules will apply to all companies in the U.S. who contact their customers through short-messaging service (“SMS” also known as “text messaging”). The new text consent rules go into effect October of 2013 and will be enforced through the federal court system, both by class-action attorneys, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and state attorneys general.

The new rules will have a considerable impact on any individual, company, or industry engaged in commercial SMS marketing. Under the original consent rules, established in 1992, text message recipients implied consent to receive commercial message simply by volunteering a phone number at the point of sale. The new rules will soon require companies and individuals to establish a paper trail that shows SMS recipients provided prior express written consent to receive text messages. Other important changes include time-of-day restrictions and opt-out requirements.

The decision leaves numerous legal questions unresolved. Courts in California are considering a “common carrier” exception to the prior express written consent rule, and companies have petitioned the Federal Communications Commission to make the exception official. The outcome on a major class-action lawsuit will turn on this exception, which should also have an impact on compliance requirements for companies across the U.S.

If your company is considering compliance strategies, considering how best to adjust to the new SMS spam rules or has been sued in a TCPA SMS spam class action lawsuit, please contact us or review a summary of our TCPA practice area.

Related Practice Areas



Related articles

Spam Law

New California Spam Case Law Requires Traceable Domains

New spam case law in California is reshaping how many advertisers and publishers do business. Specifically, new case law has allowed spam plaintiff’s lawyers to argue that senders need to...

Read Article

Spam Law

Internet Law Firm Succeeds on Summary Judgment in

On March 27, 2008 the Honorable Joseph C. Spero of the Northern District of California granted summary judgment to defendant Azoogleads.com, Inc. in a spam lawsuit. Internet Law Firm, Kronenberger...

Read Article

Spam Law

How Email Marketers Can Reduce the Risk of

Due to restrictive interpretations of the 2013 CAN-SPAM Act over the last decade, many spam plaintiffs find it more convenient to bring lawsuits instead under the California anti-spam law (CASL)—which...

Read Article

Spam Law

Internet Law Firm Secures Another Victory in Spam

On March 19, 2009 the Honorable Maxine Chesney of the Northern District of California dismissed a spam lawsuit filed by Hypertouch, Inc. against Azoogle.com and several other Defendants. Azoogle was...

Read Article
Get the help you need.

We offer legal advice on a wide range of online topics

Get legal help now

Not seeing what you’re looking for?

Submit your case in 3 minutes and get legal help fast.

Submit your case online

OR

Give us a call
Join our mailing list

Stay ahead of legal matters

The internet moves fast. We'll keep you informed.