March 01, 2022

FTC Reviews Rule on Earnings Claims

Portrait Liana Chen
By Liana Chen

Partner

Does your business make claims that consumers can make money?

The FTC recently published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to address claimed deceptive and unfair “earnings claims.”[1] While the FTC is still accepting and reviewing comments, it listed numerous recent cases in which it took issue with so-called earnings claims—which directly or indirectly promise that consumers can expect achieving a certain amount of income—in various different circumstances.

The FTC clarified its view on earnings claims under Section 5 of the FTC Act, which covers deceptive acts and practices, as follows:

  • Liability turns on whether the net impression conveyed by representations—not merely their express terms—is unsubstantiated or otherwise misleading.
  • Disclaimers do not bar liability, as they often fail to dispel a misleading impression created by other representations.
  • Good faith or a lack of intent to deceive is not a defense.
  • A company may be liable for bait-and-switch advertising or the use of “misleading door openers,” “even if the truth is subsequently made known.
  • A principal (individual) may be liable for deceptive claims made by its representatives or other agents.
  • A company may be liable for providing deceptive marketing materials for others to use on its behalf (sometimes called providing “means and instrumentalities”).

While the FTC has relied on various other rules, including ROSCA (negative option and subscription billing), the Business Opportunity Rule, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, the Consumer Review Fairness Act, and the Franchise Rule, as examples, the FTC is now considering adopting an additional earnings claim rule to add requirements and set standards for companies making any earnings claims.

Given the potential monetary and injunctive relief consequences, it is key for businesses—especially those marketing or advertising using earnings claims, including owner and client testimonials—to seek compliance advice at the outset and, of course, if an action arises. Kronenberger Rosenfeld regularly advises clients with FTC compliance, investigations, and lawsuits.


[1]https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2022/02/deceptive-earnings-claims-would-new-rule-help-protect; https://www.ftc.gov/policy/federal-register-notices/16-cfr-part-462-trade-regulation-rule-use-earnings-claims

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 01, 2022 and is filed under Press & Published Articles, Internet Law News.



Related articles

Advertising Law / FTC Compliance

CLIENT ALERT–DNC and ADA Class Action Updates

Companies marketing to consumers should be aware that there has been an uptick of litigation involving the National Do Not Call (“DNC”) Registry, which allows consumers to place their phone...

Read Article

Advertising Law / FTC Compliance

Amazon Beta-Tests One-Tap Product Reviews

Easier, more legitimate reviews. But will it be useful? Amazon is beta-testing a one-tap ratings system with the aim to make it much easier for Amazon customers to leave product...

Read Article

Advertising Law / FTC Compliance

Online Sellers Beware: FTC Increases Scrutiny of Fake

FTC Gets More Aggressive In Online Marketplaces The five-star review has become the Holy Grail for many Amazon sellers. After all, in the hyper-competitive world of the online marketplace, Amazon...

Read Article

Advertising Law / FTC Compliance

The Legal Traps of Amazon’s Fulfillment Program: Thomson

Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a program in which Amazon agrees to store and ship products for a fee so that business owners do not need to rent warehouse space...

Read Article
Get the help you need.

We offer legal advice on a wide range of online topics

Get legal help now

Not seeing what you’re looking for?

Submit your case in 3 minutes and get legal help fast.

Submit your case online

OR

Give us a call
Join our mailing list

Stay ahead of legal matters

The internet moves fast. We'll keep you informed.